Hydraulic flow unit classification from core data: case study of the Z gas reservoir, Poland

  • Affiliations:

    1 PetroVietnam Exploration Production Corporation - PVEP, Hanoi, Vietnam
    2 Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi, Vietnam
    3 AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland

  • *Corresponding:
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • Received: 9th-Feb-2021
  • Revised: 14th-May-2021
  • Accepted: 1st-June-2021
  • Online: 30th-June-2021
Pages: 29 - 36
Views: 1616
Downloads: 1166
Rating: 5.0, Total rating: 117
Yours rating


Permeability and porosity are essential parameters for estimating hydrocarbon production from reservoir rocks. They are combined in an additional factor, the Flow Zone Index (FZI), which is the basis for defining the hydraulic flow unit (HFU). Each HFU is a homogeneous section of a reservoir rock with stable parameters that allow for media flow. Hydraulic flow units are determined from the porosity and permeability of core or well logs. The simple statistical methods are applied for HFU classification and then improve permeability prediction. This paper also shows how to quickly apply the global hydraulic elements (GHE) method for HFU classification. The methodology is tested on the Miocene formation of a deltaic facies from the Carpathian Foredeep in South-Eastern Poland.

How to Cite
Ha, M.Quang, Le, A.Ngoc and Jarzyna, J. 2021. Hydraulic flow unit classification from core data: case study of the Z gas reservoir, Poland. Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences. 62, 3 (Jun, 2021), 29-36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.46326/JMES.2021.62(3).04.

Amaefule, J. O., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Kersey, D. G., and Keelan, D. K., (1993). Enhanced reservoir description: Using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells: SPE Paper 26436. 205 - 220.

Carman, P. C., (1937). Fluid Flow through Granular Beds: Trans. AIChE 15. 150 - 166.

Corbett P., Ellabard Y., Mohhammed K., (2003). Global Hydraulic Elements - Elementary Petrophysics for Reduced Reservoir Modeling: EAGE 65th Conference and Exhibition, Stavanger paper F. 26.

Corbett P. W. M. and Potter D. K., (2004). Petrotyping: a basemap and atlas for navigating through permeability and porosity data for reservoir comparison and permeability prediction: Paper prepared for presentation at the international symposium of the Society of Core Analysts held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 5 - 9 October. 1 - 12.

Davis, J. C., (1973). Statistics and data analysis ingeology: John Wiley and Sons, INC.

Ebanks W. J., (1987). Flow unit concept - integrated approach for engineering projects. Abstract presented June 8, during the roundtable sessions at the 1987 American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual Convention.

Ebanks, W. J. Jr., Scheiling, M. H., Atkinson, C.D., (1992). Flow units for reservoir characterization. In: D. Morton - Thompson, A.M. Woods (Eds.), Development Geology Reference Manual, Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Methods in Exploration Series No. 10. 282 - 284.

Kozeny, J., (1927). Uber Kapillare Letung des Wassers im Boden, Sitzungsberichte: Royal Academy of Science, Vienna, Proc. Class I 136. 271 - 306.

Matyasik I., Mysliwiec M., Lesniak G., Such P., (2007). Relationship between Hydrocarbon Generation and Reservoir Development in the Carpathian Foreland: Chapter 22 - Frontiers in Earth Science: Thrust Belt and Foreland Basin From Fault Kinetics to Hydrocarbon System, Springer.

Mysliwiec M., (2006). Types of the Miocene reservoir rocks (Zołynia - LeZajsk gas field) and the methods of the gas reserves estimation: Nafta - Gaz 62(4). 139 - 150 (in Polish, abstract in English).

Mysliwiec M., Madej K., Bys I., (2004). The Miocene gas fields discovered in the Rzeszów area, Carpathian Foredeep, on the base of the Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators: Przegląd Geologiczny 52(7). 501 - 506 (in Polish, Abstract in English).